Top Ten Worst Font Choices
August 4, 2008
I was reading "7 Fonts that should die," by 10,000 Words this morning, and it came immediately to my attention (as it did all the other commentors) that the author left out the worst font ever from his list. So, I felt I should add to amend the list of the worst font choices ever with my own spin. Here goes:
Comic Sans

Comic Sans is quite possibly the least professional font choice a "designer" can choose. It's rounded terminals and crooked stems just scream unprofessional, amateur, and in most non-designers' opinions — "cute." Cute is a horrible reason to pick a font.
Comic Sans was created to give a comic book feel. It's meant for comic book usage, not packaging, book reports, or pretty much anything (really).
I'm not the only one with a gripe about Comic Sans. There are plenty of people who hate Comic Sans with a passion as much as I do. The largest contributing factor to its overuse (#2 on the overuse list) is the fact it's on everyone's computer, since it was released by Microsoft in 1995.
Papyrus

Next to Comic Sans, Papyrus is the 3rd most overused font on the planet (I believe anyway). The sad part is that most people who use it are not designers (or worse — think they are). It also shows up on everyone's font library by default.
What does Papyrus look like? Well, try Egyptian/Biblical times. Hence why it's named after a type of paper engineered by the Egyptians. If this is so, the font should be used only in situations where the designer is trying to communicate that feeling. It doesn't communicate a beach-theme, a relaxed theme, or any other feeling besides the one it was named after.
With that, it's also really, really illegible. Font should not only be chosen for the feeling it conveys, but also for how legible it is (especially when it's used in paragraphs)!
Trajan

Trajan would be an acceptable Roman font if it wasn't overused so much. It has even been declared The Movie Font because of its over use on movie titles, posters, and dvd cases.
The reason it's chosen for movies is because it "conveys [a sense of] drama" (10,000 Words). It has this respectably quality to it. However, when used, it tends to strip the respect from the designer who chose it out of habit. It's not like there isn't any other dramatic, respectful serif fonts to chose from. Be original.
Brush Script

Brush Script, in my opinion, is the worst example of a brush script. It's like the fat cousin to a more elegant form of writing. If Times New Roman is too serious then Brush Script is too fat and lazy — as is, probably, the designer who uses it.
Copperplate

Copperplate Gothic says "my business is ugly" better than any typeface. It is the quintessential logo font choice for amateur businesses.
Whether you choose gothic light or gothic bold, it's a bad choice. But, if you want to add some shock value or a black trenchcoat-like feel, maybe you have the right to exercise your indiviuality along with everyone else who
dresses likeuses the same font.Coolvetica

Wow, another Helvetica cop-out! Why can't people just use one of the most brilliant fonts ever designed instead of trying to make their own lame version of it? Most PC's have it, so it's not a case of licensing.
And more arrogantly so, Coolvetica just is not that cool. That's like me claiming to be an awesome basketball player. Hey Larabie, what's with the lower lip on the lowercase "t?" And the "G" has to have the most arbitrary descending terminal of all time!
dearJoe

As 10,000 Words put it, dearJoe doesn't even look like handwriting. Well, at least not someone's who is sane.
Curlz MT

Curlz is cute. This is exactly why you shouldn't use it unless you're trying to make something look like an over-frilled 12 year-old girl.
Snap ITC

If I see this on another event poster or cheap advertising board I'm going to…[fill in the blank].
I can't even begin to explain why people chose this font. It's like trying to find logic in an L. Ron Hubbard book.
Goudy Stout

Substitute one letter and you get "gaudy," meaning tasteless. If Brush Script is fat, Goudy Stout is obese adopted child of what would be a more tasteful family without it. Too bad he was welcomed with open arms.
Arial

I lied, there's 11:
In a fight for an alternative to Adobe's PostScript font licensing, Apple and Microsoft opened their doors to clone fonts like Arial. Arial is a font with similarities to Monotype's Grotesque typeface and similar weights to the popular Helvetica. The problem is it's not quite as elegant or as classy as its better twin. But since the rise of the personal computer and its ability to make everyone a designer, Arial has become the widest used font in the world.
The only 2 factors redeeming it from being higher up on my list is that it's not that bad and it's so close in resembling Helvetica that it is often confusing to tell them apart — unless you kow what you're looking for.
- Top Ten Worst Font [...]
- August 4, 2008
- 11 comments
Comments
11 comments
Aero said...
How about the Webdings or Windings which All of us cannot really understand because of graphically interpreted letters or something... -_-Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:20:00 EST
JH said...
My bad... work computers are still stuck on IE6, they're only just doing a upgrade now...Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:18:00 EST
CW said...
PWNDI AGREE... great choices, and I am a designer. Everything is subjective, but a lot of designers share these type woes. Now I usually give a pass to people who aren't experienced in the area, but there is nothing worse that someone claiming they are a designer using these horrible/boring type choices. Poor type shows lack of passion to make rock star designs.Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:05:00 EST
Mark said...
Irritating@JH: Speaking of irritating fails, my 'background' that you see only shows up if you're using an old and dilapidated browser like IE6. You see, your comment in itself is ironic because there's nothing more irritating to web designers, like me, than users who continue to browse the web with Internet Explorer 6. So, I wonder where the real fail lies and I beg you to do all of us a favor and get an upgrade.Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST
JH said...
Arial rubbish?Your damn background is one of the most irritating fails a website can have!Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:04:00 EST
Mark said...
@evegreenFirst off, thanks for your comments. There is, in fact, tiredness (& maybe frustration) within my post--as well as many others out there. They've even dedicated websites & t-shirts to such things (i.e. www.bancomicsans.com). On the flip-side, designers even create movies, t-shirts, mugs, and cookie cutters from/about their favorites!
With that, I'd like to mention that taste is always subjective. You may think Curlz and other poorly designed fonts look cool. I may think they're ugly. But, that doesn't take away from the fact that they're poorly designed--based on centuries of typographic theories and practices. The reality is that non-designers never had access to printing until the rise of the personal computer. This invention opened up the floodgates to many interesting discussions on where the future of typography is headed. Without going into too much detail in my little comment box (perhaps I should write a post about this--when I have time), I'll suggest that you read a book about typography (or take a class) so you can learn more about why us designers are so very tired of seeing Papyrus, Curlz, Comic Sans, etc. Font is so much more than something that just looks "really cool"--the books will explain. This whole subject is far deeper than you realize.
You don't need Adobe products to make beautiful print work. There are plenty of great free fonts & software out there.
I'll leave you with some famous type quotes:
"Type design moves at the pace of the most conservative reader. The good type-designer therefore realizes that, for a new font to be successful, it has to be so good that only very few recognize its novelty."--First Principles of Typography, Stanley Morison"There are now about as many different varieties of letters as there are different kinds of fools."--Eric Gill
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:52:00 EST
evegreen said...
and what's left?...I really wonder, if we all bann most popular fonts\words\movies\colors, what is going to be left after all? Let's imagine, a person (not a graphics designer) wants to create a document with not a default usage of Time new roman or smth. Aaand?...some of these fonts we just banned ARE really cool, that's WHY they are (ab)used so often. Do you propose that person to waste a couple of days and $ to get a professional Photoshop/Illustrator packages, to download a couple of thousand fonts from specialized sites and spend a week to make an invitation or smth similar? I do not see a rational point in this post, only tiredness and anger.Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:15:00 EST
Michael said...
Ugly Overused FontHobo: It is ugly used for everything. Jokerman: another "look how whimsical I am" font - signage abuses aboundWed, 3 Feb 2010 14:29:00 EST
VIktor said...
Agreed with most of it except Trajan. I don't see the point to include it in the worst fonts. I know you said it's overused. But. It's a really nice font, has its unique style, and even if it's overused, i think its a good font. (Btw you never mentioned fonts like: Vivaldi, Kristen ITC, Viner Hand etc.) Cheers mate.Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:59:00 EST
Dru L. said...
Arial Black can be nice.Arial isnt all that bad, esp arial black. I can see how its alot less glamourous than helvetica, but I can think of 50 worse typefaces.Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:30:00 EST
Antje said...
Arial should also be banned too.Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:04:00 EST
